It hit that the M.T. Han a food deal to a pre themes das.
I Mr. b) desfund to stom toth C.-O. on this that the obs
Generel
in the letter off. My men rol intended Khan pissin reperen.
Ken
Hote
/
& indad will le
on Mamination, to be
rar! applicath to the
question of
Ir jums to me that in thead of quol
the Co. H 2.0. IN? Is
Then can of
che le no doubt itt right aft Chein to maintain I wish instructions
"Repulations
H Ken
4 Telan
Bood Combished, at
if they think that infeghallen show reputations wit of pand
But for the sake of t1⁄2"?
I SW. be disponed the then sende
officially the draft aft
in 4005
H.K.__ to myght puvates the tin alteration
it The notuid – i. 2 if it could be
den inffensials. M. 17/7
927/1
A
209
(the withes to suggest two alterations in the proponed draps to Albock contained in the 2.0. letter of July 12.
1. The phrase "it does not appene opew * the cuticionn of Sir R. Macdonald" dres Not really with the formint. The Proclamation Stater that certain outrages committed notly gort Offices, lette purous, faluly apuming ther character,
this macdonald taps
the
is untrue, & that have been committed by
mbrages fficials & will be 50
May
or may
again. All this notte so but this
Can
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:It appears that the M.T. Han had a food deal to a previous theme das.
I, Mr. b) refused to go to the C.-O. on this, as the observations
General
in the letter off. My men were not intended to Khan passin reperen.
Ken
Note
/
& indeed will be
on Examination, to be
rare! applicable to the
question of
It jumps to me that instead of quol
the C.O. H 2.0. Is?
Then can be of
no doubt it is right after Chein to maintain I wish instructions
"Regulations
H Ken
4 Telan
Good Combined, at
if they think that infringement will show regulations with of pand
But for the sake of half?
I should be disposed then to send
officially the draft after
in 4005
H.K. to might privately make the tin alteration
if The notified – i.e. if it could be
done informally. M. 17/7
927/1
A
209
(I wish to suggest two alterations in the proposed drafts to Albock contained in the C.O. letter of July 12.
1. The phrase "it does not appear open to the criticism of Sir R. Macdonald" does Not really fit the formint. The Proclamation States that certain outrages committed mostly by Govt Officials, letter persons, falsely assuming their character,
this Macdonald taps
the
is untrue, & that have been committed by
outrages officials & will be so
May
or may
again. All this is not so but this
Can
it hit that the mt han a food deal to a pre themes das.
I Mr. b) desfund to stom toth C.-O. on this that the obs
Generel
in the letter off. My men rol intended Khan pissin reperen.
Ken
Hote
/
& indad will le
on Mamination, to be
rar! applicath to the
question of
Ir jums to me that in thead of quol
пиш
the Co. H 2.0. IN? Is
Then can of
che le no doubt itt right aft Chein to maintain I wish instructions
"Repulations
H Ken
4 Telan
Bood Combished, at
if they think that infeghallen show reputations wit of pand
But for the sake of t1⁄2"?
I SW. be disponed the then sende
officially the draft aft
in 4005
H.K.__ to myght puvates the tin alteration
it The notuid – i. 2 if it could be
den inffensials. M. 17/7
a
927/1
A
209
(the withes to suggest two alterations in the proponed draps to Albock contained in the 2.0. letter of July 12.
1. The phrase "it does not appene opew * the cuticionn of Sir R. Maidoneld" dres Not really with the formint. The Proclamation Stater that certain outrages committed notly gort Offices, lette purous, faluly apuming ther character,
this macdonald taps
the
is untrue, & that have been committed by
mbrages fficials & will be 50
May
or may
again. All this notte so but this
Can
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.